Evaluation and Reporting on Contaminant Hydrogeological
12-12-01
Conditions at the Tajiguas Landfill
Page 13 of 24
All groundwater samples should be analyzed for all gasoline constituents as well
as for all oxygenates and lead scavengers by EPA Method 8260b. All groundwater
samples should also be analyzed utilizing EPA Method 8260b for all constituents,
including but not limited to, all chlorinated solvents as well as 1,4, dioxane. In
addition, all groundwater and surface water samples should be analyzed for total
and fecal coliform and enterococus bacteria. Finally, all chemicals, identiyed in the
groundwater in the past must be analysed as well.
All potential point sources of contamination which were burried in the landfill
such as barrels of solvents should also undergo point source subsurface
investigations.
The scale house and maintenance shop should undergo an immediate point
source subsurface investigation based upon a complete Phase I Environmental audit
to identify gasoline, chlorinate solvents and other VOCs commonly associated with
this type operation.
H
OLOCENE
F
AULTING AND
P
OTENTIAL FOR
S
URFACE
R
UPTURE
For the 1988 Expansion EIR, an acceleration number of 0.39g was used. They
then revised their number to 0.354g but still claimed that the slopes were still stable
at 2/1. The EIR consultant, Geologic Associates, performed the new slope stability
analysis using a maximum probable earthquake ground acceleration of 0.21g. This is
the original number used in the same consultant’s projection for benchfill stability.
The slope stability analysis was done under the assumption that the landfill mass is
not saturated. Their disclaimer states that if the landfill was saturated then they
would not be held to their stability analysis projections.
Another issue is whether or not the proposed expansion is resting upon a
Holocene fault. The draft EIR makes no mention as to whether or not the proposed
landfill expansion will overly an active fault. On page 3-1 of the September 2001
SLOPE STABILITY EVALUATION, no mention is made as to whether or not local
faults may cause surface rupture in the future which may impact the landfill and/or
landfill expansion. Also, there is no mention as to whether or not these local faults
are Holocene. Furthermore, the text refers to the Dames and Moore, 1995 report, yet
does not expressly concur with the reports findings nor does it state specifically that
the Dames and Moore report verifies that the faults in questions are Holocene or not.